Kwartalnik Krajowej Szkoły Sądownictwa i Prokuratury * 2025* tom 57* zeszyt 1-2* s. 94-100 * ISSN (ONLINE) 3072-337X

Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 4.02.2020 r., III KK 602/18

Gloss to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 4.02.2020, III KK 602/18

Jan Kluza – doktor nauk prawnych, sędzia orzekający w Wydziale Karnym Sądu Rejonowego w Kielcach, Zastępca Przewodniczącego II Wydziału Karnego, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0929-6093.

https://doi.org/10.53024/7.1-2.57.2025

URL: https://www.kssip.gov.pl/sites/default/files/jan_kluza

Artykuł w formacie epub

Artykuł w formacie mobi

SUMMARY:

The subject of the commentary is the Supreme Court judgment concerning the conviction of the accused in two separate judgments, in a situation where the acts charged against him constitute in fact one conduct within the framework of an actual concurrence of offences. On the basis of the Petty Offences Code, unlike in criminal law, in art. 9 § 1 of the Petty Offences Code, the legislator adopted the construction of an eliminatory concurrence of provisions, within the framework of which the fulfilment of the features of a more severely punished offence absorbs the fact of committing less severely punished offences. In such a case, a conviction for a fragment of this conduct in another proceeding is excluded, even in the event of a motion for punishment filed by another public prosecutor.

Key words: concurrence of offences, res judicata, actual concurrence.

Bibliographic Citation:

KLUZA, J. Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 4.02.2020 r., III KK 602/18, Kwartalnik Krajowej Szkoły Sądownictwa i Prokuratury. 2025, t. 57, z. 1-2, s. 94-100. ISSN (ONLINE) 3072-337X. DOI: 10.53024/7.1-2.57.2025